Posted |  Blog Archives

The Cost of Delay in Fisheries Management

People tend to equate taking no action with doing no harm. Yet by taking no action when action is called for, fishery managers can do real harm to fish stocks. … More Info »

The Beer-Reviewed Stock Assessment: A Fisheries Phenomenon

We’ve all heard about peer-reviewed stock assessments. That’s what you get when a team of biologists assesses the health of one stock of fish, and another panel of expert scientists, unrelated to the first, reviews that team’s work and determines whether it is good enough to use for fisheries management purposes. If it is, it represents a sort of “gold standard” for fisheries managers, who can then establish regulations based on the assessment, and be reasonably certain that they’re doing the right thing. However, if you go down to the docks, pick up a press release put out by one of the anglers’ rights groups or read some of the comments on Internet chat boards, you’ll find that a lot of people don’t give the peer-reviewed assessments, or the scientists who provide them, much weight. … More Info »